<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1669 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Intervener&#039;s application, directing the RP to return the raw material to the Intervener and the Intervener to reimburse the pre-CIRP expenses incurred by the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal clarified the applicability of moratorium provisions and the rights and obligations under the Bailor-Bailee Agreement, ensuring a fair resolution of the issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:59:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1669 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Intervener&#039;s application, directing the RP to return the raw material to the Intervener and the Intervener to reimburse the pre-CIRP expenses incurred by the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal clarified the applicability of moratorium provisions and the rights and obligations under the Bailor-Bailee Agreement, ensuring a fair resolution of the issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>