<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1278 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289817</link>
    <description>The court upheld the assessee company&#039;s claim for 40% depreciation on specified vehicles used for transportation, distinguishing them from machinery like excavators. The Tribunal cited precedents from Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court and Hon&#039;ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in support. Additionally, the deletion of the addition on account of bad debts amounting to Rs. 3,08,890/- was upheld as the debts were either previously included in income or given as loans in the ordinary course of business. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1278 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289817</link>
      <description>The court upheld the assessee company&#039;s claim for 40% depreciation on specified vehicles used for transportation, distinguishing them from machinery like excavators. The Tribunal cited precedents from Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court and Hon&#039;ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in support. Additionally, the deletion of the addition on account of bad debts amounting to Rs. 3,08,890/- was upheld as the debts were either previously included in income or given as loans in the ordinary course of business. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>