<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 556 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397613</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties imposed by the AO under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of promotion expenses for Assessment Years 2011-12 &amp;amp; 2012-13. The tribunal ruled that once the additions triggering penalties were deleted, there was no basis for upholding the penalties. Consequently, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed, and the penalties were not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 556 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397613</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties imposed by the AO under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of promotion expenses for Assessment Years 2011-12 &amp;amp; 2012-13. The tribunal ruled that once the additions triggering penalties were deleted, there was no basis for upholding the penalties. Consequently, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed, and the penalties were not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>