<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 554 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397611</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to furnish an indemnity bond for the balance amount of the differential duty within eight days to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Surat. Upon receipt, the goods would be released by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Maharashtra, within four weeks, disposing of the writ application challenging the severe conditions imposed for the provisional release of LED Television sets under Section 110-A of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:59:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 554 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397611</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to furnish an indemnity bond for the balance amount of the differential duty within eight days to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Surat. Upon receipt, the goods would be released by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Maharashtra, within four weeks, disposing of the writ application challenging the severe conditions imposed for the provisional release of LED Television sets under Section 110-A of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>