<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 552 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, deeming the rejection of transaction value arbitrary and in violation of Customs Act provisions. They upheld the restoration of the declared value, citing minimal variation in Nickel content as normal. The penalty imposition was rejected, with the respondent entitled to consequential benefits. The stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 552 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, deeming the rejection of transaction value arbitrary and in violation of Customs Act provisions. They upheld the restoration of the declared value, citing minimal variation in Nickel content as normal. The penalty imposition was rejected, with the respondent entitled to consequential benefits. The stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>