<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1540 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289814</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 but allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 in part. The additions made under sections 2(24)(iv) and 2(22)(e) were deleted for the latter years, and the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) were also canceled. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings require conclusive proof of concealment, which was not established in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:52:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1540 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289814</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 but allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 in part. The additions made under sections 2(24)(iv) and 2(22)(e) were deleted for the latter years, and the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) were also canceled. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings require conclusive proof of concealment, which was not established in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>