https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397595 Service of the demand notice and insolvency notices was treated as valid where they were dispatched and delivered to the corporate debtor's registered or recorded address, with proof of delivery available and no appearance or reply filed. The Section 9 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application was held maintainable because the operational debt had been crystallised in arbitration, the award had attained finality after the set-aside challenge was dismissed, and limitation ran from that point. On that basis, the insolvency filing in April 2019 was within three years, and the absence of any surviving dispute did not bar recourse to Section 9. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:27:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397595 Service of the demand notice and insolvency notices was treated as valid where they were dispatched and delivered to the corporate debtor's registered or recorded address, with proof of delivery available and no appearance or reply filed. The Section 9 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application was held maintainable because the operational debt had been crystallised in arbitration, the award had attained finality after the set-aside challenge was dismissed, and limitation ran from that point. On that basis, the insolvency filing in April 2019 was within three years, and the absence of any surviving dispute did not bar recourse to Section 9. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397595