<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 537 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397594</link>
    <description>Limitation for a Section 7 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application runs from the date of default under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, but a written acknowledgment of liability made before expiry of limitation renews the period under Section 18; on the facts, the debtor&#039;s letter of 18 March 2016 acknowledged the dues and kept the claim within time. A prior insolvency proceeding against another alleged guarantor did not, by itself, bar proceedings against the corporate debtor, and no sufficient basis was shown to make the later application untenable. The insolvency process was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 537 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397594</link>
      <description>Limitation for a Section 7 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application runs from the date of default under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, but a written acknowledgment of liability made before expiry of limitation renews the period under Section 18; on the facts, the debtor&#039;s letter of 18 March 2016 acknowledged the dues and kept the claim within time. A prior insolvency proceeding against another alleged guarantor did not, by itself, bar proceedings against the corporate debtor, and no sufficient basis was shown to make the later application untenable. The insolvency process was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>