<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Understanding Assignment Deed Cancellation: Executants vs. Non-Executants &amp; Legal Routes Under Specific Relief Act Sections 31 &amp; 34.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54447</link>
    <description>Cancellation of assignment deed - When it comes to cancellation of a deed by an executant to the document, such person can approach the Court under section 31, but when it comes to cancellation of a deed by a non-executant, the non-executant must approach the Court under section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Cancellation of the very same deed, therefore, by a non-executant would be an action in personam since a suit has to be filed under section 34. However, cancellation of the same deed by an executant of the deed, being under section 31, would somehow convert the suit into a suit being in rem. All these anomalies only highlight the impossibility of holding that an action instituted under section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is an action in rem. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:12:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding Assignment Deed Cancellation: Executants vs. Non-Executants &amp; Legal Routes Under Specific Relief Act Sections 31 &amp; 34.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54447</link>
      <description>Cancellation of assignment deed - When it comes to cancellation of a deed by an executant to the document, such person can approach the Court under section 31, but when it comes to cancellation of a deed by a non-executant, the non-executant must approach the Court under section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Cancellation of the very same deed, therefore, by a non-executant would be an action in personam since a suit has to be filed under section 34. However, cancellation of the same deed by an executant of the deed, being under section 31, would somehow convert the suit into a suit being in rem. All these anomalies only highlight the impossibility of holding that an action instituted under section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is an action in rem. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:12:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>