<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1517 - ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY, NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289801</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad, held that the 1B petition was infructuous as another petition against the same Corporate Debtor had been admitted previously. The Operational Creditor was directed to file their claim before the Resolution Professional. The 1B Petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1517 - ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY, NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289801</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad, held that the 1B petition was infructuous as another petition against the same Corporate Debtor had been admitted previously. The Operational Creditor was directed to file their claim before the Resolution Professional. The 1B Petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>