https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289811 The Supreme Court held that the application of res judicata was incorrect as the causes of action in the 1962 possession suit and the 1988 partition suit were different. The plaintiff was decreed a share in the property based on inheritance, rejecting the defendant's claim of exclusive possession and adverse possession due to insufficient evidence. The Court ordered a partition of the property with the appellants receiving 35% and the respondent 65%, or sale if partition was unfeasible, to resolve the dispute. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:41:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289811 The Supreme Court held that the application of res judicata was incorrect as the causes of action in the 1962 possession suit and the 1988 partition suit were different. The plaintiff was decreed a share in the property based on inheritance, rejecting the defendant's claim of exclusive possession and adverse possession due to insufficient evidence. The Court ordered a partition of the property with the appellants receiving 35% and the respondent 65%, or sale if partition was unfeasible, to resolve the dispute. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289811