https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289809 In a money suit alleging fraud and collusion, a temporary injunction may be justified where pleadings, correspondence and forensic material establish a prima facie case and a real apprehension that defendants may dissipate assets to defeat recovery. The discussion explains that Order 39 Rule 1(b) CPC applies when a defendant threatens to dispose of property with intent to defraud creditors, and that the court may restrain transfer or alienation even in a monetary claim if the balance of convenience favours protection. Objections based on delay, disputed facts and inherent powers were treated as unpersuasive on the stated facts, with security directed to protect the claim. en-us Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:41:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289809 In a money suit alleging fraud and collusion, a temporary injunction may be justified where pleadings, correspondence and forensic material establish a prima facie case and a real apprehension that defendants may dissipate assets to defeat recovery. The discussion explains that Order 39 Rule 1(b) CPC applies when a defendant threatens to dispose of property with intent to defraud creditors, and that the court may restrain transfer or alienation even in a monetary claim if the balance of convenience favours protection. Objections based on delay, disputed facts and inherent powers were treated as unpersuasive on the stated facts, with security directed to protect the claim. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289809