<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act from Rs. 2,53,351 to Rs. 45,737, holding that &quot;income&quot; does not include loss for penalty purposes. The court upheld the reduction, finding no evidence of inaccurate particulars regarding the loss. Additionally, the Rs. 29,000 credit was not deemed concealed income as the assessee fulfilled the burden of proof, and the Department failed to show concealment. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld, and the assessee was awarded costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:07:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act from Rs. 2,53,351 to Rs. 45,737, holding that &quot;income&quot; does not include loss for penalty purposes. The court upheld the reduction, finding no evidence of inaccurate particulars regarding the loss. Additionally, the Rs. 29,000 credit was not deemed concealed income as the assessee fulfilled the burden of proof, and the Department failed to show concealment. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld, and the assessee was awarded costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>