<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 525 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397582</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the Advance Ruling, determining that the Appellant is not acting as a mere intermediary but is providing transportation services independently. Additionally, the value of the bus passes distributed by the Appellant must be included in the total value of the facilitation charges as per Section 15 of the CGST Act. The appeal filed by the Appellant was dismissed in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 525 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397582</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the Advance Ruling, determining that the Appellant is not acting as a mere intermediary but is providing transportation services independently. Additionally, the value of the bus passes distributed by the Appellant must be included in the total value of the facilitation charges as per Section 15 of the CGST Act. The appeal filed by the Appellant was dismissed in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>