<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 65 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23033</link>
    <description>A Tribunal valuation of a teak wood plantation was set aside where it reduced the accepted figure without cogent reasons or supporting material. The approved valuer&#039;s report had been accepted by the accountable person and was not shown to be illegal or infirm, so the Tribunal could not reject it on surmise or on an unsupported assumption of impending legislation. Although market valuation is ordinarily a question of fact, an arbitrary estimate made without principle is not binding. The valuation accepted by the Appellate Controller was therefore left undisturbed in principle, and consequential orders were to follow on that limited aspect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:06:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 65 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23033</link>
      <description>A Tribunal valuation of a teak wood plantation was set aside where it reduced the accepted figure without cogent reasons or supporting material. The approved valuer&#039;s report had been accepted by the accountable person and was not shown to be illegal or infirm, so the Tribunal could not reject it on surmise or on an unsupported assumption of impending legislation. Although market valuation is ordinarily a question of fact, an arbitrary estimate made without principle is not binding. The valuation accepted by the Appellate Controller was therefore left undisturbed in principle, and consequential orders were to follow on that limited aspect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>