https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289799 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of all three forums and dismissing the respondents' suit. The Court emphasized that the correction in the record of right, without proper evidence or documentation, could not be the sole basis for declaring ownership. The absence of substantial proof led to the rejection of the respondents' claim, highlighting the importance of concrete evidence in land ownership disputes. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:42:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289799 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of all three forums and dismissing the respondents' suit. The Court emphasized that the correction in the record of right, without proper evidence or documentation, could not be the sole basis for declaring ownership. The absence of substantial proof led to the rejection of the respondents' claim, highlighting the importance of concrete evidence in land ownership disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289799