<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 504 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397561</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to adopt a higher value for the cost of acquisition using the rent capitalization method. The decision emphasized the importance of considering actual market value and rental income in assessing capital gains for the property in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:39:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 504 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397561</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to adopt a higher value for the cost of acquisition using the rent capitalization method. The decision emphasized the importance of considering actual market value and rental income in assessing capital gains for the property in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>