<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 499 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397556</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional, setting aside the order permitting the set off amount. They directed the Respondents to pay the set off amount to Aircel Entities. The decision was based on the overriding effect of IBC provisions, emphasizing that Accounting Conventions cannot prevail over specific laws like IBC. Any interim orders issued were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:25:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 499 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397556</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional, setting aside the order permitting the set off amount. They directed the Respondents to pay the set off amount to Aircel Entities. The decision was based on the overriding effect of IBC provisions, emphasizing that Accounting Conventions cannot prevail over specific laws like IBC. Any interim orders issued were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>