<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 492 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397549</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that retention money constitutes operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It found no pre-existing dispute and ruled the application was within the limitation period. The respondent was deemed an operational creditor owed a payable debt, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the admission of the application under Section 9 of the IBC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 492 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397549</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that retention money constitutes operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It found no pre-existing dispute and ruled the application was within the limitation period. The respondent was deemed an operational creditor owed a payable debt, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the admission of the application under Section 9 of the IBC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>