<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 20 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23026</link>
    <description>The court upheld the rejection of the waiver petition under sections 273A and 273A(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to lack of a firm assurance from the Commissioner of Income-tax. However, it quashed the prosecution launched against the petitioners for offences under sections 276C(1) and 277, citing a violation of natural justice principles. The court allowed the writ petition in part, upholding the penalty imposed but setting aside the prosecution order and related proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 20 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23026</link>
      <description>The court upheld the rejection of the waiver petition under sections 273A and 273A(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to lack of a firm assurance from the Commissioner of Income-tax. However, it quashed the prosecution launched against the petitioners for offences under sections 276C(1) and 277, citing a violation of natural justice principles. The court allowed the writ petition in part, upholding the penalty imposed but setting aside the prosecution order and related proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>