<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1992 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289794</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court addressed the penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for disclosed gifts in the original income return. It emphasized the necessity of specifying the nature of the breach in penalty proceedings to uphold jurisdiction and ensure the proper application of the law. The Court highlighted the importance of thoroughly reviewing facts and legal provisions to determine the validity and justifiability of penalties in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1992 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289794</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court addressed the penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for disclosed gifts in the original income return. It emphasized the necessity of specifying the nature of the breach in penalty proceedings to uphold jurisdiction and ensure the proper application of the law. The Court highlighted the importance of thoroughly reviewing facts and legal provisions to determine the validity and justifiability of penalties in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>