https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289783 Execution objections cannot be used to reopen issues already decided in earlier proceedings, including matters finally settled by the Supreme Court; Explanation VII to Section 11 CPC was applied to execution proceedings, so repeated challenges were treated as barred by res judicata and constructive res judicata. The executing court was not required to frame issues or allow evidence where no real triable controversy survived and the objections only sought to delay execution. An Article 142 order did not change the sale into a private sale or invalidate the sale certificate under Order 21 Rules 92 to 94 CPC; the sale remained an execution sale and the certificate was upheld. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Aug 2020 17:29:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289783 Execution objections cannot be used to reopen issues already decided in earlier proceedings, including matters finally settled by the Supreme Court; Explanation VII to Section 11 CPC was applied to execution proceedings, so repeated challenges were treated as barred by res judicata and constructive res judicata. The executing court was not required to frame issues or allow evidence where no real triable controversy survived and the objections only sought to delay execution. An Article 142 order did not change the sale into a private sale or invalidate the sale certificate under Order 21 Rules 92 to 94 CPC; the sale remained an execution sale and the certificate was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289783