https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289781 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the partnership was not at will and the respondent could not dissolve it but could seek accounting or retire from the partnership. The respondent was given the option to amend the plaint to seek appropriate reliefs, and the appellants were allowed to amend their written statement, except for raising the issue of limitation. The suit would be disposed of expeditiously if the respondent chose to amend the plaint; otherwise, it would be dismissed. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. en-us Tue, 13 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289781 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the partnership was not at will and the respondent could not dissolve it but could seek accounting or retire from the partnership. The respondent was given the option to amend the plaint to seek appropriate reliefs, and the appellants were allowed to amend their written statement, except for raising the issue of limitation. The suit would be disposed of expeditiously if the respondent chose to amend the plaint; otherwise, it would be dismissed. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289781