https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397538 The Court rejected the Government Pleader's argument that the absence of tax details in the e-way bill justified detaining goods under Section 129 of the GST Act. Emphasizing that detention should only occur for clear contraventions, not minor document discrepancies, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner. As the prescribed documents were provided and no statutory breach occurred, the detention was deemed unjustified. The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the detention notices, and ordered the immediate release of the goods to the petitioner upon providing a copy of the judgment to the authorities. en-us Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397538 The Court rejected the Government Pleader's argument that the absence of tax details in the e-way bill justified detaining goods under Section 129 of the GST Act. Emphasizing that detention should only occur for clear contraventions, not minor document discrepancies, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner. As the prescribed documents were provided and no statutory breach occurred, the detention was deemed unjustified. The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the detention notices, and ordered the immediate release of the goods to the petitioner upon providing a copy of the judgment to the authorities. Case-Laws GST Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397538