<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 477 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397534</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Director&#039;s decision to invoke Section 263 of the Income Tax Act due to the lack of enquiry by the Assessing Officer. It directed a fresh assessment of the deduction claim under Section 80IB(10) by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing that the Tribunal erred in law by setting aside the Section 263 order and addressing the merits of the case. The appeal was disposed of with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 477 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397534</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Director&#039;s decision to invoke Section 263 of the Income Tax Act due to the lack of enquiry by the Assessing Officer. It directed a fresh assessment of the deduction claim under Section 80IB(10) by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing that the Tribunal erred in law by setting aside the Section 263 order and addressing the merits of the case. The appeal was disposed of with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>