<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 471 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the payment made to the LIC Group Gratuity Scheme was deductible as a business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, deeming it an unjustified exercise of revisionary powers, as the original assessment by the Assessing Officer was found to be correct and not prejudicial to revenue interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 471 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the payment made to the LIC Group Gratuity Scheme was deductible as a business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, deeming it an unjustified exercise of revisionary powers, as the original assessment by the Assessing Officer was found to be correct and not prejudicial to revenue interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>