<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 470 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by the assessee in a case involving alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to estimate a lower gross profit rate of 12.50% on the alleged bogus purchases, differing from the higher rates applied by lower authorities. It emphasized the onus on the taxpayer to prove transaction genuineness and referred to precedents taxing only the profit element in such transactions. The decision settled the dispute over the addition of bogus purchases between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:09:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 470 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by the assessee in a case involving alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to estimate a lower gross profit rate of 12.50% on the alleged bogus purchases, differing from the higher rates applied by lower authorities. It emphasized the onus on the taxpayer to prove transaction genuineness and referred to precedents taxing only the profit element in such transactions. The decision settled the dispute over the addition of bogus purchases between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>