<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1991 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289772</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in imposing penalties for disclosed gifts and the validity of penalty proceedings without specifying the nature of the breach. The Court admitted reframed substantial questions of law related to these issues, emphasizing the importance of addressing jurisdictional matters and ensuring procedural fairness in penalty assessments under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:57:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1991 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289772</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in imposing penalties for disclosed gifts and the validity of penalty proceedings without specifying the nature of the breach. The Court admitted reframed substantial questions of law related to these issues, emphasizing the importance of addressing jurisdictional matters and ensuring procedural fairness in penalty assessments under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>