https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289773 The writ petition was not maintainable because the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 provided an efficacious statutory appeal against the impugned order passed under section 39(1). The Court declined to bypass the appellate mechanism and held that the petitioner should pursue the remedy under section 62, including seeking interim or protective relief before the appellate authority. The petition was dismissed with liberty to avail the alternate remedy. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:57:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289773 The writ petition was not maintainable because the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 provided an efficacious statutory appeal against the impugned order passed under section 39(1). The Court declined to bypass the appellate mechanism and held that the petitioner should pursue the remedy under section 62, including seeking interim or protective relief before the appellate authority. The petition was dismissed with liberty to avail the alternate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289773