https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23014 Questions on real income from sticky accounts, change from mercantile to cash system for such accounts, and charging interest on accounts closed for more than three years were treated as already concluded by binding Supreme Court precedent, so no referable question survived on those points and they were rejected. The question on accrual of bonus liability was held to arise from the Tribunal's order and therefore satisfied the reference requirement under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; it was directed to be stated and referred. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23014 Questions on real income from sticky accounts, change from mercantile to cash system for such accounts, and charging interest on accounts closed for more than three years were treated as already concluded by binding Supreme Court precedent, so no referable question survived on those points and they were rejected. The question on accrual of bonus liability was held to arise from the Tribunal's order and therefore satisfied the reference requirement under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; it was directed to be stated and referred. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23014