<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 445 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397502</link>
    <description>The court set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to jurisdictional defects in the notice and lack of clarity on the charge against the appellant. The appeal was allowed, overturning the penalty order and lower appellate decisions, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 445 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397502</link>
      <description>The court set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to jurisdictional defects in the notice and lack of clarity on the charge against the appellant. The appeal was allowed, overturning the penalty order and lower appellate decisions, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>