<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 437 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397494</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter to the AO for fresh examination regarding the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 on account of unexplained cash deposits. The Tribunal noted deficiencies in the AO&#039;s verification process and required further examination. The other grounds of appeal, including the validity of the order under section 143(3) and the sustenance of trading addition, were dismissed or deemed general in nature without separate adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 437 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397494</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter to the AO for fresh examination regarding the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 on account of unexplained cash deposits. The Tribunal noted deficiencies in the AO&#039;s verification process and required further examination. The other grounds of appeal, including the validity of the order under section 143(3) and the sustenance of trading addition, were dismissed or deemed general in nature without separate adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>