<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 435 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the interest paid on the loan raised against the FDRs was deductible under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the expenditure was incurred to preserve the income-earning apparatus and had a direct nexus with the interest earned from the FDRs. Consequently, the decision of the CIT(A) was overturned, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 435 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the interest paid on the loan raised against the FDRs was deductible under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the expenditure was incurred to preserve the income-earning apparatus and had a direct nexus with the interest earned from the FDRs. Consequently, the decision of the CIT(A) was overturned, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>