<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 433 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the orders extending suspensions beyond 90 days, directing officers&#039; reinstatement. High Court upheld the quashment but clarified officers should not be considered under suspension from contested order dates, not after 90 days. Authorities instructed to determine suspension period treatment and entitlements per rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 433 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the orders extending suspensions beyond 90 days, directing officers&#039; reinstatement. High Court upheld the quashment but clarified officers should not be considered under suspension from contested order dates, not after 90 days. Authorities instructed to determine suspension period treatment and entitlements per rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>