<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1525 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the corporate debtor&#039;s application for a stay on the pronouncement of orders in the main company petition, emphasizing the absence of specific directions from the Gauhati High Court. The Tribunal proceeded to pronounce the orders, highlighting the importance of clear instructions in legal proceedings and asserting its authority to proceed in the absence of explicit guidance to the contrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:26:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1525 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the corporate debtor&#039;s application for a stay on the pronouncement of orders in the main company petition, emphasizing the absence of specific directions from the Gauhati High Court. The Tribunal proceeded to pronounce the orders, highlighting the importance of clear instructions in legal proceedings and asserting its authority to proceed in the absence of explicit guidance to the contrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>