https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289756 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court and trial court's orders dismissing the application to reopen evidence under Section 151. The Court directed the trial court to reconsider the application, emphasizing the potential relevance of the new evidence in clarifying the appellant's consistent claim that the agreement was a loan security. The dismissal of the application under Order 18 Rule 17 was upheld, and the trial court was instructed to assess the necessity and manner of admitting the new evidence for just adjudication. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289756 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court and trial court's orders dismissing the application to reopen evidence under Section 151. The Court directed the trial court to reconsider the application, emphasizing the potential relevance of the new evidence in clarifying the appellant's consistent claim that the agreement was a loan security. The dismissal of the application under Order 18 Rule 17 was upheld, and the trial court was instructed to assess the necessity and manner of admitting the new evidence for just adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289756