https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289752 The court allowed the reconsideration of a case involving the seizure of cash by police from an individual. The learned Magistrate's dismissal of the application under section 451 Cr.P.C. was set aside, directing the petitioner to involve the Income Tax Department and the Directorate of Enforcement. The Magistrate was instructed to issue notices to all parties and dispose of the matter appropriately. The Income Tax Department was granted the liberty to file a claim petition for adjudication. This decision emphasizes the importance of due process and involving all relevant parties in asset seizure cases for a fair assessment. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:38:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289752 The court allowed the reconsideration of a case involving the seizure of cash by police from an individual. The learned Magistrate's dismissal of the application under section 451 Cr.P.C. was set aside, directing the petitioner to involve the Income Tax Department and the Directorate of Enforcement. The Magistrate was instructed to issue notices to all parties and dispose of the matter appropriately. The Income Tax Department was granted the liberty to file a claim petition for adjudication. This decision emphasizes the importance of due process and involving all relevant parties in asset seizure cases for a fair assessment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289752