<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 409 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. It directed the assessing officer to permit the deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act by considering the amount utilized for purchasing the house until the due date for filing the revised return under section 139(4), in accordance with section 54F.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 409 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. It directed the assessing officer to permit the deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act by considering the amount utilized for purchasing the house until the due date for filing the revised return under section 139(4), in accordance with section 54F.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>