<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 51 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23002</link>
    <description>A loan secured on National Defence Gold Bonds was not deductible as a debt in computing net wealth because the bonds were wholly exempt from wealth-tax, so the debt was secured on property not chargeable to wealth-tax. The later use of the borrowed funds to acquire taxable assets was irrelevant to the operation of section 2(m)(ii). The court therefore answered the reference in the negative and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:25:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 51 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23002</link>
      <description>A loan secured on National Defence Gold Bonds was not deductible as a debt in computing net wealth because the bonds were wholly exempt from wealth-tax, so the debt was secured on property not chargeable to wealth-tax. The later use of the borrowed funds to acquire taxable assets was irrelevant to the operation of section 2(m)(ii). The court therefore answered the reference in the negative and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>