<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 404 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to consider the amenity charges under the head income from house property instead of income from other sources. The lower authorities&#039; orders were overturned, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 404 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to consider the amenity charges under the head income from house property instead of income from other sources. The lower authorities&#039; orders were overturned, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>