https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397455 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging NCLT and NCLAT orders, asserting its jurisdiction. It emphasized the authority's discretion in determining hearing modes during the pandemic, rejecting mandamus for specific modes. The Court highlighted parties should address hearing constraints directly to the adjudicating authority and appellate bodies. The petition challenging NCLAT's expeditious disposal order was rejected, indicating Supreme Court jurisdiction for such challenges. The Court imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000, emphasizing the authority's role in deciding hearing modes based on resources and technology, underscoring challenges to appellate orders through statutory appeals. en-us Sat, 01 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:23:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397455 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging NCLT and NCLAT orders, asserting its jurisdiction. It emphasized the authority's discretion in determining hearing modes during the pandemic, rejecting mandamus for specific modes. The Court highlighted parties should address hearing constraints directly to the adjudicating authority and appellate bodies. The petition challenging NCLAT's expeditious disposal order was rejected, indicating Supreme Court jurisdiction for such challenges. The Court imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000, emphasizing the authority's role in deciding hearing modes based on resources and technology, underscoring challenges to appellate orders through statutory appeals. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Sat, 01 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397455