<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 397 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the valuation of the land as agricultural despite past industrial use. It affirmed the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority and the validity of the sale notice. The Tribunal found the Appellant&#039;s delay tactics unjustified, imposing a cost of Rs. 50,000 for abuse of the judicial process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:19:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 397 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the valuation of the land as agricultural despite past industrial use. It affirmed the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority and the validity of the sale notice. The Tribunal found the Appellant&#039;s delay tactics unjustified, imposing a cost of Rs. 50,000 for abuse of the judicial process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>