<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process must prioritize majority stakeholders&#039; interests; settling with two creditors risks injustice.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54393</link>
    <description>Initiation of CIRP - Settlement of disputes between the parties - where interests of the majority of stakeholders are in serious jeopardy, it would be inappropriate to allow settlement with only two creditors which may amount to perpetrating of injustice. Exercise of inherent powers in such cases would be a travesty of justice. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:19:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:19:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process must prioritize majority stakeholders&#039; interests; settling with two creditors risks injustice.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54393</link>
      <description>Initiation of CIRP - Settlement of disputes between the parties - where interests of the majority of stakeholders are in serious jeopardy, it would be inappropriate to allow settlement with only two creditors which may amount to perpetrating of injustice. Exercise of inherent powers in such cases would be a travesty of justice. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:19:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>