<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23000</link>
    <description>The court determined that the deed dated January 26, 1973, was a sale, not an agreement to sell, transferring the capital asset on that day. The court declined to decide on the capital gains assessment due to ongoing evaluations of the consideration amount and relief eligibility under section 48 of the Act. The Income-tax Officer was directed to investigate further based on the Tribunal&#039;s decision and the court&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:21:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23000</link>
      <description>The court determined that the deed dated January 26, 1973, was a sale, not an agreement to sell, transferring the capital asset on that day. The court declined to decide on the capital gains assessment due to ongoing evaluations of the consideration amount and relief eligibility under section 48 of the Act. The Income-tax Officer was directed to investigate further based on the Tribunal&#039;s decision and the court&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>