<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 384 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the impugned order for exceeding jurisdiction but upheld the order directing the Appellant to implement the Resolution Plan unconditionally. Emphasizing judicial discipline and timely implementation, the Tribunal highlighted the obligations of the Successful Resolution Applicant to adhere to the approved plan to prevent liquidation and value deterioration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 384 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the impugned order for exceeding jurisdiction but upheld the order directing the Appellant to implement the Resolution Plan unconditionally. Emphasizing judicial discipline and timely implementation, the Tribunal highlighted the obligations of the Successful Resolution Applicant to adhere to the approved plan to prevent liquidation and value deterioration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>