https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397431 The Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the complainant proved the guilt by demonstrating the loan transaction and dishonor of the cheque. The Court dismissed the accused's appeal, affirming the lower courts' decisions as the accused failed to provide substantial evidence to counter the complainant's claims. The legal presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act favored the complainant, and the Court concluded that the accused's defense lacked proof, leading to the dismissal of the revision petition. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:14:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397431 The Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the complainant proved the guilt by demonstrating the loan transaction and dishonor of the cheque. The Court dismissed the accused's appeal, affirming the lower courts' decisions as the accused failed to provide substantial evidence to counter the complainant's claims. The legal presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act favored the complainant, and the Court concluded that the accused's defense lacked proof, leading to the dismissal of the revision petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397431