<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the I&amp;amp;B Code as the operational debt and default were not proven, and pre-existing disputes existed between the parties. The Tribunal clarified it did not rule on the merits of the Applicant&#039;s claim, allowing the Applicant to pursue remedies through the appropriate legal channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the I&amp;amp;B Code as the operational debt and default were not proven, and pre-existing disputes existed between the parties. The Tribunal clarified it did not rule on the merits of the Applicant&#039;s claim, allowing the Applicant to pursue remedies through the appropriate legal channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>