<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 16 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22992</link>
    <description>Where compensation, solatium and interest had already been fixed in the land acquisition award, there was no difficulty in filing the return, so refusal to waive interest under sections 139(8) and 217 of the Income-tax Act was not shown to be unreasonable or irrelevant. The High Court found no basis for writ interference with the Commissioner&#039;s decision under section 264, as the recorded reasons for declining relief for the later period were sustained on the available facts. Relief was therefore not granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:36:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 16 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22992</link>
      <description>Where compensation, solatium and interest had already been fixed in the land acquisition award, there was no difficulty in filing the return, so refusal to waive interest under sections 139(8) and 217 of the Income-tax Act was not shown to be unreasonable or irrelevant. The High Court found no basis for writ interference with the Commissioner&#039;s decision under section 264, as the recorded reasons for declining relief for the later period were sustained on the available facts. Relief was therefore not granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>