<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397414</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to multiple legal defects, including the invalid issuance of the second notice under Section 148, the improper approval by the CIT, and the lack of conditions for reopening beyond four years. The other grounds on merits were not adjudicated as they became academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397414</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to multiple legal defects, including the invalid issuance of the second notice under Section 148, the improper approval by the CIT, and the lack of conditions for reopening beyond four years. The other grounds on merits were not adjudicated as they became academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>