<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Denial of Tax Exemption: Separate Properties Can&#039;t Be Treated as One House u/s 54F.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54383</link>
    <description>Denial of exemption u/s 54F - LTCG - No case law has been brought to our notice wherein two distinctly placed properties have been allowed for claim of deduction u/s 54F. Keeping in view, the geographical distances, the investment in two differently placed properties cannot be termed to be “a residential house” even after resorting to liberal interpretation of “a residential unit”. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:22:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:22:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Denial of Tax Exemption: Separate Properties Can&#039;t Be Treated as One House u/s 54F.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54383</link>
      <description>Denial of exemption u/s 54F - LTCG - No case law has been brought to our notice wherein two distinctly placed properties have been allowed for claim of deduction u/s 54F. Keeping in view, the geographical distances, the investment in two differently placed properties cannot be termed to be “a residential house” even after resorting to liberal interpretation of “a residential unit”. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:22:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>